Home   |  About Us   |  Contacts   |  Products    
 News Items
 Top Stories
 News Briefs
 Also Featuring
 Movie Reviews
 Sunday Scripture
 CNS Blog
 Links to Clients
 Major Events
 2008 papal visit
 World Youth Day
 John Paul II
 For Clients
 Client Login
 CNS Insider
 We're also on ...
 RSS Feeds
 Top Stories
 Movie Reviews
 CNS Blog
 For More Info

 If you would like
 more information
 about Catholic
 News Service,
 please contact
 CNS at one of
 the following:
 (202) 541-3250


 This material
 may not
 be published,
 rewritten or
 except by
 linking to
 a page on
 this site.

 CNS Story:

THEOLOGIANS Sep-22-2010 (710 words) With photo and book cover. xxxn

Doctrine committee says 2008 book errs in views on moral issues

By Nancy Frazier O'Brien
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- In their 2008 book, "The Sexual Person," theologians Todd A. Salzman and Michael G. Lawler "reach a whole range of conclusions that are contrary to Catholic teaching," the U.S. bishops' Committee on Doctrine said in a 24-page critique.

The document, dated Sept. 15 and made public Sept. 22, said the theologians' methodology "marks a radical departure from Catholic theological tradition" and their conclusions "cannot provide a true norm for moral action and in fact are harmful to one's moral and spiritual life."

The committee specifically cited errors in the book's conclusions that homosexual acts, premarital sex, contraception and artificial insemination can be morally acceptable, in contrast to church teachings.

Salzman chairs the theology department at Creighton University in Omaha, Neb., and Lawler, who retired in 2005, is a professor emeritus there.

The doctrine committee, chaired by Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl of Washington, said the critique was prompted by "the pastoral danger that readers of the book could be confused or misled, especially since the book proposes ways of living a Christian life that do not accord with the teaching of the church and the Christian tradition."

"The issues treated in 'The Sexual Person' are indeed vital matters for the life of the church in our time," it added. "They should be thoroughly studied and discussed by theologians as part of their service to the church and to society. ...

"New presentations of the truth of Catholic moral teaching are needed today, but the proposal contained in 'The Sexual Person' is seriously flawed and falls short of the goal of theological investigation, 'fides quaerens intellectum,'" the committee said. The phrase is Latin for "faith seeking understanding."

The doctrine committee's review of the book, subtitled "Toward a Renewed Catholic Anthropology" and published by Georgetown University Press, came at the request of the current and former archbishops of Omaha. Now-retired Omaha Archbishop Elden F. Curtiss first criticized the views of the two theologians in 2007, saying they "cannot be considered authentic Catholic teaching."

Jesuit-run Creighton University said in a Sept. 22 statement that it "accepts as authoritative" the committee's statement and "presents to its students as Catholic doctrine only that which is deemed to be true doctrine."

"As a comprehensive university, Creighton is nonetheless mindful of its obligation to honor the academic freedom of individual faculty members," it added. "Indeed, in his April 2008 address to Catholic educators, Pope Benedict XVI 'reaffirm(ed) the great value of academic freedom.'"

The statement also thanked Archbishop George J. Lucas of Omaha for the "positive working relationship between the archdiocese and the university" and said the university "strives to, and is confident that it will, maintain this positive relationship."

In its critique, the doctrine committee said it would have been easy to simply "cite the texts presenting magisterial teaching" on the issues raised in the book, but it decided it would be more helpful "to examine the basic presuppositions of the alternative moral theology proposed in 'The Sexual Person.'"

"This examination could thus serve the broader purpose of helping Catholic moral theologians more generally to continue rediscovering a more adequate basis for addressing contemporary moral questions," it said.

For example, Salzman and Lawler "strive to show that what the Scriptures say" about certain sexual behaviors "is not relevant to our present questions," the committee said.

"The basic problem of the use of Scripture in 'The Sexual Person' is that the authors treat scriptural statements as so historically conditioned that they have no relevance for subsequent ages," it added. "Such an extreme position is neither correct as a philosophical assertion nor compatible with the Christian faith."

The committee also cited problems with the authors' interpretation of natural law, their rejection of a dualistic view of the human person and their reliance on experience as the foundational criterion for moral judgments.

"There is need of a standard above one's personal experience -- provided by natural law, Scripture and the magisterium," the document said. "Salzman and Lawler, however, explicitly reject the idea of a hierarchy among the sources of moral knowledge. ... In this approach, there is no overall authority to resolve conflicts among the sources; there can only be 'dialogue.'"

"The Sexual Person" won first place among theology books in the Catholic Press Association's book competition for 2008.


Copyright (c) 2010 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed.
CNS · 3211 Fourth St NE · Washington DC 20017 · 202.541.3250