Home   |  About Us   |  Contacts   |  Products    
 News Items
 Top Stories
 News Briefs
 Also Featuring
 Movie Reviews
 Sunday Scripture
 CNS Blog
 Links to Clients
 Major Events
 2008 papal visit
 World Youth Day
 John Paul II
 For Clients
 Client Login
 CNS Insider
 We're also on ...
 RSS Feeds
 Top Stories
 Movie Reviews
 CNS Blog
 For More Info

 If you would like
 more information
 about Catholic
 News Service,
 please contact
 CNS at one of
 the following:
 (202) 541-3250


 This material
 may not
 be published,
 rewritten or
 except by
 linking to
 a page on
 this site.

 CNS Story:

HEALTH-ABORTION Mar-19-2010 (510 words) xxxn

Pro-life official sees need for healing after health reform divisions

By Nancy Frazier O'Brien
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- It might take time to mend the divisions among some Catholic groups about whether the Senate-passed health reform bill expands federal funding of abortion, a leading pro-life official of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said March 19.

Richard Doerflinger, associate director of the USCCB Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities, spoke two days before the expected House vote on health care reform at a teleconference with officials of the Family Research Council and the National Right to Life Committee.

"The church does have some work to do in dealing with frayed nerves and divisions on policy questions," Doerflinger said. "But I don't think it is the moral teaching (on abortion) that is at the root of this. It's people who are not in Washington cooking the details of this every day" being misled by others, he added.

Asked why the Catholic Health Association had endorsed the bill opposed by the bishops because of its abortion wording, Doerflinger said, "Like us, they have been very anxious to have health care reform for many years. But unlike us, they don't have policy people who work on these pro-life issues day in and day out."

Doerflinger said the Senate bill "is morally unacceptable" because it appropriates billions of dollars in new funding that would not be subject to the provisions of the Hyde amendment, which bars most federal spending on abortion, and because it would create a "stunning new conscience problem" by requiring people in certain health plans to pay for other people's abortions.

Representatives of all three groups said they did not expect any changes to be made in the abortion language of the Senate-passed bill and therefore would oppose its passage in the House.

Doerflinger said he believed "where there was a will, there would be a way" to make changes in the bill before the House, despite procedural barriers. But, he said, "there is no will" in the White House or congressional leadership to do so.

On March 18 several Hispanic bishops joined Bishop John C. Wester of Salt Lake City, chairman of the USCCB Committee on Migration, in urging House members to allow undocumented immigrants in the U.S. to use "their own money to purchase health care coverage in the newly created health care exchanges."

"We also request that the five-year ban on legal immigrants accessing Medicaid coverage be eliminated," they said in a letter. Current law forbids legal immigrants to access Medicaid benefits for five years after being admitted to the United States.

During the teleconference Tom McClusky, senior vice president of the Family Research Council, called the legislation "the biggest expansion of government-funded abortion since Roe v. Wade" and Douglas Johnson, federal legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee, said it was "the most abortion-expansive bill ever to reach the floor of the House for a vote."

Johnson said he believed "the outcome is in doubt" for the House vote, expected to occur March 21.

"As that famous Roman Catholic scholar Yogi Berra said, 'It ain't over until it's over," McClusky said.


Copyright (c) 2010 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed.
CNS · 3211 Fourth St NE · Washington DC 20017 · 202.541.3250