| About Us
| Products |
OBAMA-STEMCELLS (THIRD UPDATE) Mar-12-2009 (1,090 words) With photos and graphic posted March 9. xxxn
Cardinal says new Obama stem-cell policy favors politics over ethics
By Nancy Frazier O'Brien
Catholic News Service
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- President Barack Obama's executive order reversing the ban on federal funding of embryonic stem-cell research represents "a sad victory of politics over science and ethics," Cardinal Justin Rigali of Philadelphia said shortly after the March 9 signing of the order at the White House.
The chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities was among Catholic, pro-life and other leaders who criticized the reversal, which Obama had promised during his campaign.
Speaking in the East Room of the White House, Obama said the stem-cell policy of former President George W. Bush, in effect since Aug. 9, 2001, had forced "a false choice between sound science and moral values."
Obama also urged Congress to consider further expansion of funding for such research. Since 1995, the Dickey/Wicker amendment to the annual appropriations bills for federal health programs has barred federal funding of research involving the creation or destruction of human embryos.
But the president had strong words against human cloning, which he said is "dangerous, profoundly wrong and has no place in our society, or any society." He said he would work to ensure that "our government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human reproduction."
Among the several dozen people present at the White House for the signing were members of Congress, scientists, families whose members had been or could be affected by stem-cell breakthroughs, and representatives of the Episcopal and United Methodist churches, several Jewish bodies and the Interfaith Alliance.
Obama said a "majority of Americans -- from across the political spectrum, and of all backgrounds and beliefs -- have come to a consensus that we should pursue" embryonic stem-cell research.
But Cardinal Rigali said the executive order "disregards the values of millions of American taxpayers who oppose research that requires taking human life" and "ignores the fact that ethically sound means for advancing stem-cell science and medical treatments are readily available and in need of increased support."
He reiterated points raised by Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago, USCCB president, who said in a Jan. 16 letter to Obama that a change in the policy on funding of embryonic stem-cell research "could be a terrible mistake -- morally, politically and in terms of advancing the solidarity and well-being of our nation's people."
Archbishop Rino Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, said most scientists recognize embryonic stem-cell research has not proved promising, which led him to wonder if economic interests might be driving the push to use embryos.
Most scientists have affirmed that "currently embryonic stem cells lead nowhere," he told Vatican Radio March 11, while "adult stem cells, on the other hand, have already led to the cure of some 2,000 diseases."
People, therefore, should try to figure out "what special interests, probably of some pharmaceutical companies, are behind this ever more forcible interference in science and research and, in this case, in politics, too," he said.
Bishop Elio Sgreccia, former president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, said allowing the use of public funds for embryonic stem-cell research was "without ethical or scientific justification."
The decision to reverse the ban on federal funding was based on "utilitarian logic" that failed to take into account the fact that embryos are human beings, he told the Italian news agency ANSA March 9.
"It's about the destruction of human beings in order to turn them into material for experimentation," he said.
Bishop Sgreccia said it was unclear why research on embryonic stem cells would need to be pursued now that new discoveries have been made with other kinds of stem cells.
He referred to the work of a Japanese biologist who found in 2007 that adult stem cells could easily be reprogrammed to an embryonic state.
At the White House, Obama said he "cannot guarantee that we will find the treatments and cures we seek. No president can promise that."
"But I can promise that we will seek them -- actively, responsibly and with the urgency required to make up for lost ground," he added.
The Bush policy had allowed funding of embryonic stem-cell research only when the stem-cell line had been created before Aug. 9, 2001. The executive order Obama signed permits federal funding of stem-cell lines created since then, but would not allow funding of the creation of new lines, leaving that decision to Congress.
Obama also signed a "presidential memorandum on scientific integrity" March 9, ordering the director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop a strategy for ensuring that "the administration's decisions about public policy be guided by the most accurate and objective scientific advice available."
He said scientific advisers should be appointed "based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology."
But Paul A. Long, vice president for public policy at the Michigan Catholic Conference, said the order "regrettably places ideology and political posturing ahead of proven scientific therapeutic advancements."
"There are endless studies and stories of patients who have been treated, even cured of their debilitating condition following stem-cell therapies that do not necessitate the destruction of human embryos, yet the ... executive order makes every tax-paying American citizen unwittingly complicit in the destruction of human embryos for experimental research."
Bishop Robert W. Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Mo., called Obama's action the "newest step by the president to eventually remove all legal protections for innocent, nascent human life."
"The president boldly proclaimed that he was taking the politics out of science," Bishop Finn added. "Rather, it seems clear that he is only asserting 'his politics' over life itself."
Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life of America, said the president's decision -- which the organization "is against, ... period" -- surprised the group and signaled "a cooling of our relations" with the Obama administration.
"While we have zero confidence that a call for a reversal of this executive order will prevail, we are hopeful that the president will heed our call for common-ground solutions in dealing with pro-life Democrats," Day added, citing in particular the Pregnant Women's Support Act.
Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., the author of a 2005 law authorizing $265 million in federal research funds for adult stem cells from cord blood and bone marrow, asked in a statement: "Why does the president persist in the dehumanizing of nascent human life when better alternatives exist?"
"On both ethics grounds and efficacy grounds nonembryonic-destroying stem-cell research is the present and future of regenerative medicine -- and the only responsible way forward," Smith added.
Copyright (c) 2009 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed.
CNS · 3211 Fourth St NE · Washington DC 20017 · 202.541.3250