Home   |  About Us   |  Contacts   |  Products    
 News Items:
 News Briefs
 Word To Life
 More News:
 Special Sections:
 2007 in review
 Inside the Curia
 2006 in review
 Vatican II at 40
 John Paul II
 Other Items:
 Client Area
 Did You Know...

 The whole CNS
 public Web site
 headlines, briefs
 stories, etc,
 represents less
 than one percent
 of the daily news

 Get all the news!

 If you would like
 more information
 about the
 Catholic News
 Service daily
 news report,
 please contact
 CNS at one of
 the following:
 (202) 541-3250


 This material
 may not
 be published,
 rewritten or
 (c) 2006
 Catholic News
 Conference of
 Catholic Bishops.

 CNS Story:

WASHINGTON LETTER Oct-27-2008 (1,060 words) Backgrounder and analysis. With photo. xxxn

Do plethora of voter guides confuse or clarify issues for Catholics?

By Nancy Frazier O'Brien
Catholic News Service

WASHINGTON (CNS) -- If a group of Catholics were to sit down to read four or five of the "Catholic voter guides" in circulation before Election Day, it wouldn't be surprising if they ended the session more confused than when they began.

Various Catholic organizations, religious communities, bishops individually and collectively, and even some individual Catholics have put into writing their best advice on how Catholic social teaching should guide decisions in the voting booth.

"Catholics must strive to put in place candidates, laws and political programs that are in full accord with nonnegotiable moral values," says the California-based Catholic Answers Action, the cultural and political action arm of the apologetics and evangelization organization Catholic Answers. In its "Voter's Guide for Serious Catholics," the group names five issues as nonnegotiable -- abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, human cloning and same-sex marriage.

The Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, on the other hand, sees the election in much broader terms in its voter guide, called "Loving Our Neighbors in a Shrinking World."

"Peace. Security. Racial equity. Economic well-being. A healthy environment. Human dignity. These are the basic needs of every human being and of the earth," it says. "We encourage candidates to make explicit their commitment to the global common good."

"In the Voting Booth: A Catholic's Guide," a brief brochure written by Greg Erlandson of Our Sunday Visitor, quotes liberally from "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship," the U.S. bishops' 2007 document on political responsibility, providing guidance in a question-and-answer format.

"In a world of prudential judgments, it is quite possible that well-formed and educated Catholics may differ on what is the best choice to make in the voting booth," Erlandson writes. "But we are called to draw upon the teachings of our faith in coming to our decisions, not party loyalty, self-interests or political slogans."

Most of the guides rely heavily on quotations from "Faithful Citizenship," which calls on Catholics to view candidates' stands in light of Catholic teaching, giving priority attention to "the intentional taking of innocent human life, as in abortion and euthanasia."

The bishops urge voters to avoid "two temptations in public life" that can distort church teaching.

"The first is a moral equivalence that makes no ethical distinctions between different kinds of issues involving human life and dignity," they say. "The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among many.

"The second is the misuse of these necessary moral distinctions as a way of dismissing or ignoring other serious threats to human life and dignity," they add. "Racism and other unjust discrimination, the use of the death penalty, resorting to unjust war, the use of torture, war crimes, the failure to respond to those who are suffering from hunger or a lack of health care, or an unjust immigration policy are all serious moral issues that challenge our consciences and require us to act. These are not optional concerns which can be dismissed."

One guide titled "Faithful Catholic Citizenship Based Upon the Gospel of Life" uses the logo developed by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops for its "Faithful Citizenship" program but clearly rejects the bishops' nuanced approach.

"We cannot vote for a pro-choice candidate even if our motive is 'the common good' of society on other issues," says the guide, produced by Randall Terry, the founder of Operation Rescue who became a Catholic in 2005. "The attempt to justify a vote for a pro-choice candidate based on the candidate's views on war, the economy, health care or other issues is actually self-deception."

Some of Terry's followers have been arrested for distributing their brochures outside Catholic churches without permission.

In the swing states of Ohio and Pennsylvania, voters in 50,000 Catholic households were getting electoral advice delivered to their homes in a direct-mail campaign by Catholics United, which describes itself as a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to promoting the Catholic social traditions of justice and the common good.

The Catholics United mailer urges voters to look at whether some candidates considered pro-life really promote life over a broad range of issues.

"In 2004, many were led to believe that President (George W.) Bush's stated position on abortion made him the only acceptable candidate for the pro-life Catholic vote," said Chris Korzen, director of Catholics United, in a news release. "The experience of the past eight years proves what an absolute disaster this sort of thinking can be."

But some see another potential disaster in the proposed Freedom of Choice Act, which Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama has promised to sign as president.

"Recently a politician made a promise," wrote Bishop Arthur J. Serratelli of Paterson, N.J., in an Oct. 16 column in The Beacon diocesan newspaper. "If this politician fulfills his promise, not only will many of our freedoms as Americans be taken from us, but the innocent and vulnerable will spill their blood."

Although Bishop Serratelli did not name Obama in the column, he said the politician to whom he was referring was the "present Democratic candidate." Americans United for Separation of Church and State asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate whether the column violated the IRS ban on political campaign intervention by tax-exempt organizations.

In response, Bishop Serratelli said his intention was not to support one candidate over another. "The church's role is to teach about life and to invite Catholics and other persons of good will to consider the moral implications of the various issues being discussed in the presidential campaign," he said Oct. 21. "This was my intention in addressing the troubling situation in which some politicians support the Freedom of Choice Act."

The best advice for a Catholic voter might come from Erlandson of Our Sunday Visitor, whose brochure adapted from "Faithful Citizenship" offers four steps to take before entering the voting booth:

-- "1. Inform yourself about the church's teachings. ...

-- "2. Inform yourself about the issues. Read the Catholic press and listen to the candidates. See where the candidates stand on critical moral and social issues.

-- "3. Seek input from Catholics you respect.

-- "4. Pray. Take your concerns, worries and confusion to the Lord and ask for his guidance."


Copyright (c) 2008 Catholic News Service/USCCB. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed.
CNS · 3211 Fourth St NE · Washington DC 20017 · 202.541.3250